Skip to main content

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: guyzilla Date: Jan 18, 2010 7:35pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: is "The Undertaker And His Pals" PD?

I think it might be but I'm not taking it for granted.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: skybandit Date: Jan 19, 2010 3:18am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: is 'The Undertaker And His Pals' PD?

According to V-C, "Undertaker And His Pals" (1966) had a Valid Notice. Sorry.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: guyzilla Date: Jan 19, 2010 10:27am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: is 'The Undertaker And His Pals' PD?

Thanks. Figured it might be something like that. "Undertaker" would probably have already been here if it was PD. I'll see about another one later.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmico Date: Jan 19, 2010 5:59pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: is 'The Undertaker And His Pals' PD?

Alpha Video needs to hire Video Cellar as their copyright researcher...and pay him well!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmico Date: Jan 18, 2010 9:21pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: is 'The Undertaker And His Pals' PD?

Alpha Video has it, so I'd say it's most likely a PD film.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: guyzilla Date: Jan 19, 2010 2:33am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: is 'The Undertaker And His Pals' PD?

That makes it more likely but they also have NIGHT OF THE BLOOD BEAST, and you may remember a previous conversation we had about that one, it turned out to be copyright. I'll keep my fingers crossed.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cosmico Date: Jan 19, 2010 3:51am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: is 'The Undertaker And His Pals' PD?

I'm surprised that a company like Alpha lets non-PD titles slip through. Oh well.